Blog Details

Introduction

If you are dealing with electronic evidence in India — a WhatsApp chat, an email, a CCTV clip, a spreadsheet or a server log — you have probably seen two section numbers mentioned almost interchangeably: Section 65B and Section 63. They are not two different rules pulling in opposite directions. They are the same idea across two statutes: the older one under the Indian Evidence Act, and the newer one under the law that replaced it. This article is a plain comparison of Section 63 BSA vs Section 65B IEA — what stayed the same, what changed, and which one applies to your matter — and how e-Dex (formerly Hash Calculator) helps you build the right certificate without having to track the transition by hand.

The Quick Version

The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA) replaced the Indian Evidence Act 1872 and came into force on 1 July 2024. Within that new statute, Section 63 of the BSA is the successor to Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act. Both provisions deal with the same problem: when you want to put an electronic record before a court as secondary evidence — a printout, a copy on a disk, an exported file — you generally need a certificate alongside it. So at the highest level, the answer to “what is the difference?” is: not the principle, but the wording, the statute, and the prescribed form.

What Stayed the Same

The heart of the rule carried over almost untouched. A certificate is still required to admit electronic records as secondary evidence — the BSA did not abolish the certificate, it re-enacted it. The underlying integrity and source principle is the same too: the law wants to know where the record came from, how it was produced, and that it has not been tampered with. That is why hashing has always mattered. A cryptographic hash is a digital fingerprint of the exact bytes, so anyone can recompute it later and confirm the file is identical to what was certified. Whether you are working under Section 65B or Section 63, that integrity logic is what a good certificate is built around.

What Changed

Two things are worth knowing. First, the language was modernised: the BSA re-states the rule in updated terms that better reflect today's computers, networks and storage, rather than the 1872 Act's older framing. Second — and this is the practical change for anyone preparing a certificate — the BSA introduced a Schedule with a prescribed certificate form. That form is commonly described as having a Part A and a Part B: broadly, Part A captures details about the electronic record and how it was produced, and Part B records the device and the hash values. Under the old Section 65B regime there was no single statutory form, so practitioners drafted their own certificates to satisfy the requirements. Under the BSA there is a defined structure to follow.

A Word on the Supreme Court's Position

The most cited authority on the certificate requirement is the Supreme Court's decision in Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (2020). The Court held that a Section 65B(4) certificate is a mandatory pre-requisite for admitting secondary electronic evidence, while recognising that relief may be available where a party genuinely cannot obtain the certificate because the device is in someone else's possession. That reasoning was decided under the Indian Evidence Act, but it explains why the certificate requirement was carried into Section 63 of the BSA rather than dropped. How that case law is read and applied under the new statute is still developing, so treat this as background, not a fixed rule for your facts.

Which Provision Applies to Your Matter?

Broadly, it turns on the date of the record and the proceeding. Matters squarely under the new regime engage Section 63 of the BSA, while older matters may still turn on Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act. In practice the dividing line can be fact-specific — when the record was created, when the proceeding began, and how a particular court approaches the transition can all matter — and the position is still settling. The safe approach is not to guess from a blog, but to confirm with counsel which provision and which form your court expects. For a fuller walkthrough of the rules on both sides, this guide to electronic-evidence certificates in India is a useful companion.

How e-Dex Handles the Transition for You

This is where a tool helps. Rather than asking you to remember whether a record falls under the old or new provision, e-Dex selects the correct framing automatically based on the record's date, so the certificate it generates references the right statute and follows the appropriate structure. You add the files you have already collected or exported, e-Dex computes the cryptographic hash of each one (SHA-256 and others), and it produces a Section 63 BSA / Section 65B electronic-evidence certificate laid out in the familiar Part A / Part B form, with an explicit MATCH verification against each exhibit. To be clear about scope: e-Dex does not capture or extract the evidence from its source — you collect or export it, and e-Dex then hashes and certifies the resulting files. If you want to see the layout first, this Section 65B certificate format with an example is a helpful reference.

Signing and Timestamping

Whichever provision applies, the same integrity tooling sits on top. e-Dex can apply a PAdES digital signature using a Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) on a USB token, binding the signer's identity to the document so later edits are detectable, and it can attach an RFC-3161 trusted timestamp from a Time-Stamping Authority as independent proof of when the certificate existed in that form. Everything runs from your own Windows machine, fully offline — only the timestamp request touches the internet. None of this depends on which section number governs your case; it strengthens the certificate either way.

A Note on Legal Advice

Everything above is general information, not legal advice, and the law in this area is evolving now that matters fall under the BSA. e-Dex is a tool that helps you produce a well-structured, integrity-backed certificate — it does not decide which provision governs your case, who must depose to the certificate, or whether a record will be admitted; those are for counsel and the court on the facts of your matter. Read the current provision and the Schedule as they stand, confirm which framework your court expects, and take advice where the stakes warrant it. If you also want to understand the limits, this note on electronic evidence without a Section 65B certificate is worth reading alongside this one.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Section 63 BSA and Section 65B IEA?
Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 is the successor to Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, and both require a certificate to admit electronic records. The core integrity principle is unchanged; the language was modernised, and the BSA added a Schedule with a prescribed certificate form in Part A and Part B. This is general information, not legal advice.

When did Section 63 of the BSA 2023 come into force?
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 replaced the Indian Evidence Act 1872 and came into force on 1 July 2024, and Section 63 took effect with it. Older proceedings and records can still engage Section 65B depending on the facts. The law is evolving, so verify the current position and take advice for your specific matter.

Which provision applies to my case, Section 63 or Section 65B?
Broadly, it depends on the date of the record and the proceeding: matters under the new regime engage Section 63 of the BSA, while older matters may still turn on Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act. The dividing line can be fact-specific and is still settling in practice, so this is general information only and you should confirm the position with counsel.

Is an electronic-evidence certificate still required under the BSA?
Yes. Like Section 65B before it, Section 63 of the BSA generally requires a certificate to admit electronic records as evidence. The requirement for a certificate carried over; the BSA modernised the wording and added a prescribed form. As always, this is general information and not legal advice, and the court decides admissibility on the facts.

Did the certificate format change under the BSA?
Yes. The BSA introduced a Schedule setting out a prescribed certificate form, commonly described as Part A and Part B, where Part A covers the electronic record and how it was produced and Part B records the device and the hash values. The Section 65B era had no single statutory form. Verify the current text of the Schedule for your matter.

Conclusion

Section 63 BSA and Section 65B IEA are two chapters of the same story: an electronic record put before an Indian court generally needs a certificate, and that certificate should pin down the source, the method and the integrity of the file. The BSA modernised the wording and added a prescribed Part A / Part B form, but the principle — verifiable, tamper-evident records — is the constant. You collect or export the evidence yourself, then let e-Dex — the Digital Evidence Integrity Suite hash the exhibits, pick the right framing for the record's date and generate a court-ready certificate on your own Windows machine, fully offline and free to try.