Article
Section 65B IEA → Section 63 BSA: Same Purpose, Prescribed Form
Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 set out how a computer output could be admitted as evidence and required a certificate to accompany it. The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) has since replaced the Evidence Act, and the equivalent provision is now Section 63, with the certificate prescribed in a Schedule to the BSA, laid out in Part A and Part B form. The purpose has not changed: the certificate links a copy of an electronic record back to its source and attests that it was produced reliably. If you are working on a matter governed by the BSA, the correct reference is Section 63 and its Schedule, even if everyone in the room still says "65B". Our deep dive on the Section 63 BSA 2023 electronic evidence certificate covers the transition in more detail.
P26Illustrative sample — fictional case, for layout reference only.
PART A — to be filled by the party producing the electronic record
Case / FIR reference: FIR No. 112/2026, P.S. Shivajinagar, Pune
Court / authority: Court of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pune
Description of the electronic record: Forensic image of the internal SSD of a seized laptop, plus three extracted document files relied upon by the prosecution
Source device (make / model / serial): Dell Latitude 5420, Service Tag 7XK2QL3, 512 GB NVMe SSD
How the record was identified and produced: The laptop was seized under panchnama on 04-Feb-2026, write-blocked, and a bit-stream forensic image was acquired. The three exhibit files were exported from that image without modification.
Period the device was in regular use & operating properly: The device was in the ordinary use of the accused from approx. May 2024 until seizure on 04-Feb-2026 and, to the best of the deponent's knowledge, was functioning normally during that period.
Acquisition tool / method: Hardware write-blocker; bit-stream image acquired and verified; hashes computed with e-Dex (Digital Evidence Integrity Suite).
Integrity / hash values per exhibit:
| Exhibit | SHA-256 | Status |
| exhibit-1.dd | 7d6b24a3…c1f09e | MATCH |
| exhibit-2.docx | a91f0b57…4e22d8 | MATCH |
| exhibit-3.pdf | 3c0e8da2…9b7740 | MATCH |
PART B — to be filled by the expert
Name: A. Sharma
Qualifications / role: Digital forensics examiner, M.Tech (Computer Science), 9 years' experience
Examination summary: Verified the forensic image against the acquisition hash, re-computed SHA-256 for each exhibit, and confirmed each value matched the recorded value with no alteration detected.
Opinion: In the examiner's opinion the exhibit files are true and unaltered copies derived from the seized device, consistent with the recorded hash values.
Signature: ____________________ Date: 23-Jun-2026 Place: Pune
Where the Hash Values Fit (MATCH / MISMATCH)
Hash values are the part of the certificate that makes integrity checkable rather than merely asserted. A cryptographic hash is a fixed-length fingerprint of a file's contents; change a single byte and the fingerprint changes completely. By recording the hash of each exhibit in Part A, the certificate lets anyone re-compute the same value later and compare. If every byte is identical the result is MATCH and the file is unchanged; if anything differs the result is MISMATCH and the file has been altered or corrupted. This is the same verifiable core described in our evidence integrity certificate article — the Section 63 / 65B certificate simply wraps those values in the court-prescribed Part A / Part B form along with the device and acquisition story.
P26) follows the Schedule form set out in the statute, organised into Part A and Part B. Part A is filled by the party producing the electronic record and describes the record, the source device, how the record was identified and produced, the period the device was in regular and proper use, and the integrity or hash values. Part B is filled by an expert and records their details and opinion. The certificate is dated and signed. Always read the current text of the Schedule to the BSA for the exact prescribed wording and fields.
Is the Section 65B certificate the same as Section 63 BSA?
They serve the same purpose. Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 governed the admissibility of
electronic records and required an accompanying certificate. The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)
replaced the Evidence Act, and the equivalent provision is now Section 63, with the certificate set out in
a Schedule to the BSA in Part A and Part B form. Practitioners often still say "Section 65B certificate"
out of habit, but for matters under the BSA the correct reference is Section 63 and its Schedule.
Who signs Part A and Part B?
Part A is completed and signed by the party producing the electronic record, that is, the person
responsible for or familiar with the device and the way the record was produced. Part B is completed and
signed by an expert who examines the record and gives an opinion. Who exactly must depose and how depends on
the facts of the matter and the current provision, so verify against the Schedule and take legal advice
where the stakes warrant it.
Is a Section 65B certificate mandatory?
Where a party seeks to rely on an electronic record as evidence, the statute requires an accompanying
certificate in the prescribed form, so in practice it is treated as essential for tendering such records.
The precise requirement, timing and any exceptions are matters of law that turn on the current provision
and the facts of the case. e-Dex helps you produce a well-structured, integrity-backed certificate, but it
is a tool, not legal advice, and it does not guarantee admissibility.
Can I generate a Section 65B certificate online or offline?
You can generate the certificate offline. e-Dex runs fully on your own Windows machine and produces the
certificate in the Part A / Part B Schedule form locally, so your evidence files never leave your computer.
You can optionally PAdES-sign it with a Digital Signature Certificate and apply an RFC-3161 trusted
timestamp; only the timestamp step needs an internet connection. Generating the certificate itself does not
require going online.
Conclusion
The Section 65B / Section 63 BSA certificate is not as intimidating as it first looks: it is a Part A about the record and its source, a Part B from an expert, and a set of hash values that make integrity provable. Once you can see where each field goes — as in the worked example above — filling it becomes a matter of recording what you already know about the device and the acquisition. You can produce one in the literal Part A / Part B form, offline, on a single Windows machine with e-Dex — the Digital Evidence Integrity Suite. Download it free and generate a clean, integrity-backed certificate, then read the current Schedule to the BSA to finalise the exact wording.